Dr. Dan Martin has retired from clinical practice and moved to Richmond, Virginia. He can be reached at:
This site maintains information about endometriosis, infertility, as well as contact information for Dr. Martin's former patients.
Endometriosis • Infertility • Former Patients • About Dr. Martin
Studying endometriosis is like nailing Jello to a tree.
Laparoscopic Appearance of Endometriosis Color Atlas 1991 revised 2007 & 2017
The microscopic characteristics of endometriosis were described more than 150 years ago by Rokitansky in 1861.
Unrecognized microscopic ovarian endometriosis was recognized more than 100 years ago by Russell in 1899. He postulated the embryonic origin of endometriosis as Müllerian remnants.
Lockyer (1917) published the first classification of endometriosis.
Sampson published an extensive series of articles and first used the name endometriosis from 1921 to 1940. He described chocolate cysts, blebs, adenomyomatous infiltration in the rectovaginal septum, adherent surfaces, red raspberries, purple raspberries, blueberries, deep infiltration, inflammatory reactions, cancer arising in endometriotic implants and peritoneal pockets.
Sampson originally used earlier theories on embryonic origin, ovarian epithelial metaplasia, dissemination form ovarian endometriosis, lymphatic spread, and venous emboli, but subsequently postulated retrograde menstruation of tissue fragments as the origin of endometriosis. His retrograde theories are included in recent theories including retrograde stem cells and epigenetic changes.
Colorless, amenorrheic lesions were seen by Fallon in 1950.
Karnaky (1969) published an age dependent appearance of endometriosis starting with an initial water blister appearance.
Goldstein (1980) found endometriosis in 47% of adolescents with chronic pain using a close-up view. There were only petechial-like lesions and blebs in 20% of those.
Semm (1987) noted subtle clear lesions detected using meticulous search with magnification and discussed invisible lesions noted only after coagulation.
Friend, scholar, scientist, historian, and clinician
In Memoriam Ronald Elmer Batt 1935 – 2017
Dr Ronald Elmer Batt died 25 April 2017 aged 83 after a prolonged illness.
He is survived by his wife Kathleen, 12 children and step-children; 31 grandchildren and step-grandchildren; 6 step-great-grandchildren; and his sisters Norma Hinchy, Eileen Batt, and Phyllis Kavanaugh.
Ron was a friend to all, a scholar, a scientist, an historian, and a wonderful clinician. He will be missed by many including those who study or treat endometriosis and who continue to benefit from his contributions.
Endometriosis Foundation of America Award 2015
There are many theories and concepts regarding endometriosis that can help in understanding endometriosis. An endometriosis theory may be useful at several levels including guiding research in treatment, acting as a framework for education, explaining why a treatment works, and studying endometriosis. However, a theory does not determine if a treatment works. Treatment should be based on evidence of its success. Discussions of how theory or the general limitations of knowledge can interfere with treatment are in the file.
Theories and concepts can be divided into the cell of origin and the pathophysiologic transition from an original endometrial cell to endometriosis
Dissemination / Metastasis
Müllerian Theories
Metaplastic Theories
Endometriosis Theories and Concepts
The transition involves the local environment, inflammation, epigenetic changes, genetic changes progenitor cell differentiation, biochemical changes immunologic changes, apoptosis, autophagy, reactive oxygen species, fibrosis, muscular metaplasia, macrophage migration inhibitor factor, clonality, microRNA, signaling, nerve activation, cancer-associated driver mutations, fibroblast to myofibroblast transdifferentiation, neurogenesis, angiogenesis, genetic dysregulation and more that are covered in the PDF.
No theory is completely adequate. Of the more than 80 theories and concepts covered in the PDF, it generally takes seven to discuss what I have seen and many more to introduce what I have read. Since theories change, the PDF “Endometriosis Theories and Concepts” will be periodically updated.
David Adamson's 2010 Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) is a clinical tool used to predict pregnancy rates after endometriosis surgery. It is the only system that is predictive of fertility, but is not a staging system. The EFI has 6 levels and uses the 1985 American Fertility Society (rAFS) staging system’s total and endometriosis sub-total score separately. The EFI is based 50% on history, 30% on surgical findings at the completion of surgery, and 20% on the rAFS scores.
The 1984 rAFS staging system was renamed the revised American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM) staging system in 1996 after that organization changed their name. The 1996 rASRM endometriosis staging system is the same as the 1984 rAFS endometriosis staging system with additional examples.
The rAFS is the staging system most commonly used at surgery but is not predictive of fertility. It can be used to describe the appearance at surgery and is somewhat predictive of surgical difficulty. The rAFS has 150 points. A score 40 or higher is rAFS stage 4. The rAFS separates stage 4 into scores for 4A (40 to 70 points) and 4B (71 to 150 points). Scores of 71 and higher are generally seen only with severe adhesions. Adhesions, a type of scar tissue, can block the pathway that the eggs use to get to the tube. Canis (1992) also uses the rAFS score of >70 to be stage 5 for endometriosis.
If your physician does not use the EFI, then you can use the following for an approximate score. Note that high scores are good.
(1) Calculate your historical factors score using the sum of the 3 historical factors.
Age
Years of Infertility
Prior Pregnancy
(2) Calculate your Surgical Factors score by comparing your understanding of your surgery to the following possibilities. If you have more than one answer, use both your highest and lowest estimates to see how those change the pregnancy rate projection on the Estimated Percent Pregnancy figure below.
(3) Add the totals for your historical factors score and your surgical factors score for a total. Compare the total with the estimated percent pregnancy below.
| EFI Score | Pregnant at 1 Year | Pregnant at 3 Years |
|---|---|---|
| 9-10 | 67% | 75% |
| 7-8 | 39% | 66% |
| 6 | 30% | 54% |
| 5 | 27% | 42% |
| 4 | 15% | 28% |
| 0-3 | 10% | 10% |
Canis (1992) suggested using a revised American Fertility Society (rAFS, 1985) score of >70 as a new stage 5 for endometriosis.
This is also the 4B sub-score of the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) (Adamson 2010). The EFI is a clinical tool used to predict pregnancy rates after endometriosis surgery. It is the only system that is predictive of fertility, but is not a staging system. The EFI has 6 levels and uses the 1985 rAFS staging system’s total and endometriosis sub-total score separately.
The rAFS (or rASRM) is the staging system most commonly used in surgical research. It is useful in comparing the gross appearance at the beginning of surgery and is somewhat predictive of surgical difficulty. But, it is not predictive of fertility, pain, the depth of infiltration, or the volume of infiltrating endometriosis.
The rAFS has 150 points. A score of 40 or higher is rASRM stage 4. The EFI separates stage 4 into scores for 4A (40 to 70 points) and 4B (71 to 150 points). Scores of 71 and higher are generally seen only with severe adhesions. Adhesions, a type of scar tissue, can block the pathway that the eggs use to get to the tube.
Adamson GD & Pasta DJ. Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system Fertil Steril 2010;94(5):1609–15
American Fertility Society. Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis 1985. Fertil Steril 43(3):351-352, 1985
American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 67(5): 817-21, 1997
Canis M, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, et al. Incidence of bilateral adnexal disease in severe endometriosis (revised American Fertility Society [AFS], stage IV): should a stage V be included in the AFS classification? Fertil Steril 1992;57:691–692.
Dr. Martin's Worksheet can be used to predict success rates after tubal reversal. This was last updated in 2016.
TODO: Add thumbnail of TR pics
Journal of Gynecologic Surgery
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc, Publishers
World Congress of Endometriosis 2017
World Congress of Endometriosis 2020
Endometriosis Association 1980-2005 Anniversary
Endometriosis Foundation of America
Insurance policies do not usually cover tubal surgery. They may cover some of the evaluation or testing before surgery without covering the surgery./p>
First check exclusions for:
Then, if services are not excluded, ask if they cover
If you get an approval letter, read it carefully for exclusions./p>
Insurance company approval does not always mean the service is covered. The claim for an approved service can be denied if the service was excluded or otherwise not covered. Check for both exclusions and coverage./p>
Note - the old codes were:
Dr Ben Abdu and Dr Laura Detti are available to follow Dr. Martin's patients in Memphis.
Dr Ben Abdu is the Divisional Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery and has revised the tubal reversal program.
Dr. Laura Detti is Director of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility.
If you were seen by Dr. Dan (Daniel) C Martin in Memphis or Germantown, Tennessee and need to request your records, please call the numbers below.
Regional One Health
UT Regional One Physicians (UTROP)
877 Jefferson Avenue
Memphis, TN 38103
Phone: (901) 545-7581
This is for UTROP services at:
7945 Wolf River Boulevard
Suite 320
Germantown, TN 38138-1733
880 Madison Avenue
3rd Floor Ob Gyn
Memphis, TN 38103
University Clinical Health
Previously: UT Medical Group (UTMG)
Phone (901) 866-8400
This is for UTMG services at:
7945 Wolf River Boulevard
Suite 320
Germantown, TN 38138-1733
Dr. Martin’s curriculum vitae (CV)